Exceeding standard does not influence? If will it be poisonous to add additive food?

Exceeding standard does not influence? If will it be poisonous to add additive food?
Some great food incidents in recent years, relate to the fact that additive exceeds standard more, so folk to demand, reduce or it cancels voice of additive to be very high. But in " national standard food additive of food security uses the standard " that is released newly ' Draft) China, is commonly called as " brightening agent of flour one " Cross and oxidize benzene formyl, is still classified as the flour and deal with pharmaceutical, cause the dispute. As to this, the relevant persons in charge of Ministry of Public Health say, are coordinating the related departments, study and cancel the flour to add the relevant regulation which oxidizes benzene formyl.
Why does not cancel the related departments directly " Brightening agent " Get over, and should " study " Besides, the woolen cloth? This is because the expert claims folk common people are to " brightening agent " Exist, misunderstand, think this piece ask, oxidize the intersection of benzene and things of formyl, use under the fixed standard, unless it is it is harmless that health, even, it is have advantage not to add by the thing,for example "at not baking by bread, can make, bake kind result " Wait a moment.
Excuse me for speaking bluntly, at some time, the expert's words may not be totally correct. In my impression, the experts are always higher than ordinary common people to the tolerance of the food security. For example gather cyanogen amine three times, the expert says that eats harmless health on a small quantity; Measured in phenol of Ren's base and the Changjiang River of hard base phenol " The hormone fish " ,The expert says there is little, not enough to be detrimental to health content. But the experts have not obviously faced such a question: Additive is a chemical material after all, if additive in all food enters the human body at the same time, will produce" The chemical reaction " (used at the end of a special alternative, or rhetorical question)?
So I think, whether additive of increase is detrimental to health, unnecessary study. If must be studieding, I propose studying conversely - -The food without additive will be poisonous? Say with a once very fashionable words, does not add additive, it will fall down! If the answer is denied, then essential that additive is not so big. No so-called only flour China " Brightening agent " ,Other food for example red three gathering the intersection of cyanogen and amine, caffeine sodium benzoate and so on in the Sudan, if it proves that does not add these things to study, will not lead to the fact the food is poisonous, should cancel together.
I think so-called " exceed standard, influence health " all the time It is the typical compromise thinking, this kind of compromise thinking adds government's supervision loophole, cause a lot of food while joining additive, deduce appear one another " the contest of exceeding standard " . This kind of phenomenon, we can also be interpreted as, the food manufacturer is in the fixed standard, swindling openly and legally - -Flour increase oxidize the intersection of benzene and formyl, can become white baking bread to be goodlooking; The Sudan is red, can make the chilli oil more lovelily red; Gather cyanogen amine three times, can make protein content of milk power higher. So long as additive does not exceed standard, such deceit is legal.
My mother is not food expert and chemical expert, as what thing she never knows additive. The steamed bun color that the homemade flour of her old man's family expenses is worked out is not very goodlooking, the noodles does not matter either " The muscle degree " ,But absolutely delicious to pay thousandfold than whom restaurant work it out. This is actually enough to prove, without additive, the flour is not poisonous, delicious all the same too.
Certainly, add additive into food, not merely those trade companies, say in a certain meaning, a lot of consumers, is the person adding the chemical material for the food too - -It was they that overly paid attention to the goods " Fair without " ,Have built the huge market for additive. Once additive becomes the indispensable component in food, must form the illusion for consumers: The white steamed bun is natural, non- white steamed buns are all dirty. It is obvious, the country is to tolerance degree of additive, should narrow constantly.
|